Less time, more thought: coping with the challenges of two-year Key Stage 3

Article

By Nathan Cole, Denise Thompson, published 1st December 2005

Nathan Cole and Denise Thompson have really thought about Key Stage 3. They have been forced to; they now teach it in only two years. The switch to a two-year Key Stage 3 has made them re-evaluate their entire programme of study, and their rationale for teaching history. The result is illuminating. They argue convincingly that social history should be taught first as a grounding for understanding political developments, and for building up a picture of the whole past through the use of really big questions. But make sure you read on - there is a twist in the tail which helps them to show that teaching history is teaching history - whatever key stage it is supposed to be.

This resource is FREE for Secondary HA Members.

HA Members can sign in to access this content or you can Join the HA if you are not already a member.